With all the demands for time and attention, it's imperative that you don't add yet another "list" of things to what is already expected of leaders. The language used in the resilience research and that used in your competence model may differ - but the behaviors may be identical or very similar. Someone with expertise in both can quickly identify the degree of overlap. Where one or more resilience behaviors are not part of your competence model, integrate them into the existing model - don't build a new one. Focus on integrating specific behaviors into existing competencies - not building new ones. Once you've integrated the resilience behaviors into your existing leadership competence model highlight them. Ensure their particular role and importance is communicated at every opportunity. Not only does building leadership resilience require all day training or offsites, it's far better to avoid them. Integrate building leadership resilience into your existing leadership meetings. Keep each module short (ideally 45 minutes but no more than 90) and highly focused. Here's a sample outline of the sequencing and length of your modules:
Even leaders who were personally involved in the September 11th attacks or other major crises may take a blasé attitude toward contingency planning. Remember one of the core responses to traumatic events is to distance oneself from them. You can counteract this by making sure to highlight the fact that the key behaviors provide successful leadership in a crisis also ensure success during the normal course of business. While the same skills are required in both crisis and non-crisis situations, in the former a much higher level of competence and performance is required. "Good enough" is not sufficient anymore. Your leaders must be extremely competent and confident in performing these key behaviors. This will ensure overcoming a crisis with the added benefit of heightening normal business performance. Again, as importantly, leaders who excel in these behaviors will drive superior business performance. Incorporate a clear focus on these core behaviors in your established talent reviews, succession planning, performance appraisals, and development plans. When you engage in table top contingency exercises, make sure a key part of the debriefing is providing each leader with feedback on how they performed these key behaviors. A key predictor of resilience is the availability of social support. Social support can encourage leaders to engage or disengage during a crisis or challenge. In order for significant others to encourage engagement they must:
Provide your leaders with the information to address each of these issues in communicating with their significant others. Communicating directly with significant others is a sensitive issue. It is best to let individual leaders initiate communication with partners, spouses, family and friends. Following this it may be helpful to provide significant others to a portion of your company's intranet where they can find appropriate, non-proprietary details of your contingency plans and available support services. 1See for example: Fostering Resilience in Response To Terrorism: A Fact Sheet for Psychologists Working With Adults, APA Task Force On Resilience in Response To Terrorism, American Psychological Association. Retrieved from www.apa.org. Retrieved June 2004. [Return to Article] 2 Speckhard, Anne. "Acute Stress Disorder in Diplomats, Military, and Civilian Americans Living Abroad Following the September 11th Terrorist Attacks on America." Professional Psychology: Research & Practice 2003, Vol. 34, No. 2, 151-158 [Return to Article] 3Dougall, A.L., et al. "Similarity of Prior Trauma Exposure as a Determinant of Chronic Stress Responding to an Airline Disaster." Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 2000, Vol. 68, No. 2, 290-295. [Return to Article] 4See for example: Maddi, S.R., Kahn, S., Maddi, K.L. "The Effectiveness of Hardiness Training." Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research. 50(2), Spr 1998, 78-86. [Return to Article] 5Fredrickson, B.L., et al. "What Good Are Postive Emotions in Crises? A Prospective Study of Resilience and Emotions Following the Terrorist Attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001." Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2003, Vol. 84, No. 2, 365-376 [Return to Article] © 2004 Flanagan Consultants, LLC. Terms and Conditions |
home |
about us |
our team |
client list |
capabilities |
engagement summaries |
articles |
contact |
site map
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||