Flanagan Consultants
Flanagan Consultants Flanagan Consultants Home About Us Our Team Contact Us Site Map
Client List
Capabilities
Engagement Summaries
Engagement Summaries
In The News

Articles


What The Leader Needs To Know: Accountable Leadership - The Universal Model


The Opportunity

A recent global survey.1 found two of CEOs’ greatest concerns were:

  • Consistent execution of strategy by top management (33.4%)
  • Speed, flexibility, adaptability to change (33.1%)

Put another way “I’m not sure my team can keep us on course nor change course when we have too.”

One common response to the lack of confidence in corporate leaders is the continual expenditure of precious resources to find a unique definition of leadership talent for the company. Often shortly after the introduction of a leadership model based upon a costly, time-consuming, in-depth competency study “the model” is rejected by a new CEO.

"…I want people who create organizations
that get aligned, get passionate,
get really inspired about delivering."

- Anne M. Mulcahy

The constant pursuit of a “new” definition of leadership may unintentionally reduce the talent supply. With each introduction of a new definition of effective leadership, a company risks alienating high potential people. These people often see a new model as the company changing the rules after they’ve made heavy personal and professional investments. They also see the development of “new” models as motivated by politics and/or egos. When one Fortune 50 company, introduced a new leadership competency model 30% of high-potential people left.

While CEOs and companies struggle to define it, the demand for superior leadership talent continues to rise. Anne M. Mulcahy of Xerox clearly states the need for leadership today: “There's not a lot of room anymore for senior people to be managers. They have to be leaders. I want people who create organizations that get aligned, get passionate, get really inspired about delivering.” 2

Our careful review of several hundred of the most respected leadership studies concludes that there is one universal set of leadership skills which ensures success in every circumstance. Importantly, possessing this universal skill set enables leaders to adjust their decision-making and behaviors when the business situation shifts. Companies that focus on one type of leader vs. another find themselves caught short when changes in the environment require a new type of leader.

The real solution to the crisis in leadership talent may be in holding people accountable for developing and using this universal skill set.

How To Leverage It

Here is how you can significantly improve your leadership talent.

  1. Focus on the universal model
    If you examine any subset of leadership models, you will find a core set of six skills that together define effective leadership across industries, geographies and business cycles. The core set of six skills is as follows.

    • Taking Inventory Of Personal Readiness & Motivations
      Many companies make significant investments in leadership assessments that give them and the individual insights into that person’s readiness to be a leader as well as their motivations for wanting the role of leader. Effective leaders understand that they are accountable for ensuring that their capabilities (i.e. readiness) and motivations meet or exceed the demands of the particular leadership role they are in. They hold themselves accountable for consistently and candidly assessing their own readiness and motives.
    • Detecting & Integrating Patterns In The Environment
      Many individuals in leadership positions are well-informed. What is lacking is the integration of the information they acquire into their business strategy and tactics. Detection and integration of new patterns in the environment is no longer a responsibility reserved for the most senior executives. In today’s world of relentless change, leaders at all levels must constantly look for and then act on new patterns.
    • Staffing The Team
      Despite all the lip-service about having the right people in the right jobs, we continue to be amazed by how many executives and managers fail to act on critical staffing issues. There is a never ending series of reasons for not removing people when they no longer meet the requirements of the job. Hiring managers are often “too busy” to fully engage in the evaluation and selection of the people that will report to them. The most effective leaders hold themselves accountable for moving quickly to change players who no longer fit and for being fully involved in the selection of new talent.
    • Focusing & Story Telling
      The turn-arounds at Honeywell (then Allied-Signal) under Bossidy, IBM under Gerstner, and McDonald’s under Cantalupo, Bell and Skinner all demonstrate how powerful focusing the entire organization on a critical few goals can be. Bossidy focused his team on cost, quality and brand; Gerstner on win, execute and team; and despite the tragic deaths of Cantalupo and Bell the three leaders kept McDonald’s renewed focus on quality, service, and cleanliness. But along with focusing the organization these and other world class leaders also provide the context for the goals chosen by developing and sharing a compelling story. A story allows employees to fully and easily grasp not only what must be done but the value of long-term success.
    • Driving Accountability & Engaging People
      Most would agree on the importance of holding people accountable. Yet often holding someone accountable for results is confused with holding them accountable for the best they could do under the circumstance. As Winston Churchill said, “It’s not enough to do our best sometimes we have to do what’s required.” Imagine how different your business would perform if everyone expected to be held accountable for results and not just efforts.
    • If you are going to get the best performance out of your people and their commitment to the challenges they face you need to engage them as you hold them accountable. Engagement goes way beyond leadership visibility. Engagement is the interdependence of the leader and the team in each others work and worklife. Engagement provides a consistent experience of contributing while simultaneously receiving support and development.

    • Building Personal Strengths
      The effective leader holds herself accountable for maintaining the most important resource she has: herself.
    • Effective leaders realize that not investing in themselves to the point where it erodes their capabilities, knowledge, social ties and health is irresponsible. Running oneself to the point of burn out is as damaging to a business as failure to maintain its infrastructure. Short-term appearances are good – long-term sustainability is jeopardized.

  2. Model accountable leadership
    The effective leader is the accountable leader. A leader who understands, develops and uses the six skills described above. Accountable leaders relentlessly use these six skills they don’t choose among them.
  3. Certainly at any point in time more effort may be invested in one of the six than the others. The accountable leader knows that should he remain exclusively focused on driving accountability and engaging employees he will be surprised by some major shift in the environment. Nor can an accountable leader focus on detecting and integrating new patterns in the environment without paying sufficient attention to daily execution. For example, Bill Ford’s stepping down as CEO was most likely not because a focus on environmental issues was incompatible with the auto business. It was likely a result of neglecting to use some of the other skills of an accountable leader such as focusing and storytelling or driving accountability and engaging employees.

  4. Facilitate the talent conversation
    Too often the talent management and succession planning processes are driven by a presentation to the Board. In this “drive to report” there is often a mad dash to fill out profiles, get pictures taken, bring databases up to date and complete charts. This is followed by one to several intense days of conversation. Conversation that can be dizzying as one after another executive or high-potential is “discussed”. Despite all the planning, resources and time expended there is little lasting result from such a process.
  5. The management of leadership talent becomes real when it is part of the DNA of the organization. When several high-potential individuals are reviewed as a standing agenda item of every management committee meeting. When no plan is crafted without the talent requirements and availabilities for its short and long-term execution. When key developmental assignments are prepared for and made throughout the year.

    There are industry specific topics central to the conversations and decisions of every organization. For the airline it’s the price of fuel. For the financial services firm the major economic indexes. For the retailer it’s consumer confidence. An on-going talent conversation is an essential ingredient to every business’ sustained success regardless of industry.

  6. Invest in infrastructure at the right time
    Too many companies invest in talent management systems prematurely. When these systems are implemented prior to the talent conversation being part of the company’s DNA the return is minimal. Success is defined as the extent to which the system is populated. Executives are asked, encouraged and cajoled into getting the online profiles of their high-potentials into the new system. Leaders are drawn away from personally getting to know high-potentials, mentoring them and determining what role(s) best suit them.
  7. A system implemented after the talent conversation is part of the company’s culture is an effective response to a demand. The value of using the system is clear. The system will be used by leaders across the enterprise and an ROI realized.

    It’s time to stop defining leadership and get on with the job of being accountable leaders.

1(2006) The CEO Challenge 2006 – Top Ten Challenges. Research Report R-1380-05-RR. ©2006 by The Conference Board, Inc.[Return to Article]

2((2005) Hammonds, K.H. “Copy This” FastCompany Issue 92.[Return to Article]

© 2004 Flanagan Consultants, LLC. Terms and Conditions

Print this page

back to top

Quick Links